Jensen et al v. Douglas et al
| Kendel Vance Jensen and Amber Jensen |
| Kelley Douglas, Donna Goodman, Jane Doe, Jonathan Doe, Tonya Burger, John Doe, Barbara Johnson, Lori Pratt, Patricia Treshbach, Brent Harris and Other Defendants |
| 3:2007cv08119 |
| November 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| Yavapai |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER granting Defendant's 29 Renewed Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as moot Plaintiffs' 34 Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing; this action is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 4/23/09.(REW, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER striking Dft's Motion to Dismiss 15 with leave to refile on or before September 15, 2008. FURTHER ORDERED granting in part Plas' Motion 22 to the extent it requests a stay of discovery. FURTHER ORDERED denying the balance of Plas' Motion (Dkt. 22). FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for September 15, 2008. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/4/08.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying Dft's 17 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/4/08.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
