Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harris v. Frauenheim
as 24-642
Petitioner / Appellant:
GERALD BRENT HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden
Peters, Thomas v. Revels, Wesley et al
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Thomas Zachary Peters
Defendant:
Wesley Revels, Christopher Weaver, Stan Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02104
Plaintiff:
BRENT HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(HC) Gerald B. Harris v. Frauenheim
as 1:2019cv01203
Petitioner:
Gerald Brent Harris
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Taylor
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dana Brent Harris
Defendant:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Smith
as 1:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dana Brent Harris
Defendant:
Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham v. Pope et al
as 5:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dillon J. Gresham
Defendant:
Willard Pope, Amy Beth Berndt, Maria L. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wright et al
as 1:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dana Brent Harris
Defendant:
D Wright and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension and Benefits Funds et al v. Portneuf Electric Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Eighth District Electrical Pension and Benefits Funds , Delinquency Committee of the Eighth District Elecrical Pension and Benefit Funds , IBEW Local 291 and others
Defendant:
Portneuf Electric Inc. , Brent Harris and Terri Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Jensen et al v. Douglas et al
as 3:2007cv08119
Plaintiff:
Kendel Vance Jensen and Amber Jensen
Defendant:
Kelley Douglas, Donna Goodman, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
