Campbell v. Thornell
| Timothy Campbell |
| Ryan Thornell |
| 3:2023cv08020 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time #5 is granted insofar as the Court will grant Petitioner 120 days from the filing date of this Order to file an amended petition in compliance with the February 9, 2023 Order. In all other respects, the Motion is denied. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 120 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration #6 is denied. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/14/2023. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration re: #3 Order by Timothy Campbell. (91 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3) (REK) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Writ of Habeas Corpus by Timothy Campbell. (3 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 200005119. PAID IN FULL. (BAS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus Case #1 , which the Court construes as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2254 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for further details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/09/2023. (REK)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) (Titled: Request for Appointment of Counsel in Federal Habeas Case) filed by Timothy Campbell. (3 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Campbell v. Thornell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Timothy Campbell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ryan Thornell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
