Newport v. Dell Inc et al
| Pamela Newport |
| Dell, Inc., Banctec, Inc., Qualxserv LLC, Dell Catalog Sales, L.P., Dell Products, L.P., Dell Marketing, L.P., Dell USA and 1-100 Does |
| 4:2008cv00096 |
| February 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Jennifer C Guerin |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Both |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims; Newport's claims for breach of warranty, Counts 2 & 3, are DISMISSED w/ PREJUDICE; adopting 79 Report and Recommendations. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Guerin for further pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 6/5/09.(JEMB, )
|
|
Filing
79
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 73 MOTION to Dismiss: Recommend granting in part denying in part; written objections due w/in 10 days, using 08cv96-TUC-CKJ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer C Guerin on 2/13/09. (KMF, )
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting 43 QualxServ's Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 63 Report and Recommendations. Plas claims against QualxServ are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. QualxServ is DISMISSED from this action.. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 10/17/08.(JKM, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
