Estrada v. Elliott

Petitioner: Andres Efren Estrada
Respondent: Elliott
Case Number: 4:2008cv00371
Filed: June 26, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Referring Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 26, 2010 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 10 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andres Efren Estrada.(CLJ, ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close file; Certificate of Appealability shall not be issued. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 7/23/10. (SMBE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estrada v. Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andres Efren Estrada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?