Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Elliott & Frantz, Inc., et al v. Wirtgen America, Inc.
as 26-5810
Plaintiff:
ELLIOTT & FRANTZ, INC., JAMES ELLIOTT and CATHERINE ELLIOTT
Defendant:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Brahler-Barnes v. Elliott et al
as 2:2026cv02149
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Brahler-Barnes
Defendant:
Veronica Elliott, Pamela Feemster, Sandra Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Nelson L Elliott
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elliott v. Kia Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00907
Plaintiff:
Kevette Elliott
Defendant:
Kia Corporation and Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Elliott v. Kia Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00908
Plaintiff:
Kevette Elliott
Defendant:
Kia Corporation and Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Elliott v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03076
Plaintiff:
Maurice Elliott
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards v. First Key Homes
as 1:2026cv10700
Plaintiff:
Elliott Edwards
Defendant:
First Key Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Benfield v. Commercial Roofing Specialties Inc et al
as 9:2026cv03868
Plaintiff:
Kelly Benfield
Defendant:
Commercial Roofing Specialties Inc and Kyle Elliott Roebuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lamar Cannon v. Ronnie Prince, et al
as 26-5784
Plaintiff:
LAMAR RISHAWN CANNON
Defendant:
RONNIE PRINCE, Administrator, C. GRANT, Correctional Officer, J. GRANT, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
