Clarke v. Astrue

Plaintiff: William Robert Clarke
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2008cv00604
Filed: November 17, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Referring Judge: Bernardo P Velasco
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 16, 2010 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 21 is adopted as the opinion of the Court. ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment 13 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 4/16/10.(SGG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clarke v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Robert Clarke
Represented By: David Anaise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?