Flores v. Trujillo et al
| Ernest Trujillo and Thomas C Horne |
| Daniel Merced Flores |
| 4:2011cv00660 |
| October 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Glenda E Edmonds (PS) |
| Frank R Zapata |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDERED that the 21 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. It is further ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed. Further Ordered that a Certificate of Appealabiity shall issue; judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 4/10/2014.(BAR)
|
|
Filing
21
*REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an order DISMISSING the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is time-barred. Any party may serve and file wr itten objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this report and recommendation to the petitioner and the respondents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 2/4/13.(BAC) *Modified opinion on 2/4/2013 (BAC).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
