Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Ralph Slusher v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-16983
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, ERNEST TRUJILLO, Northern Regional Director at Arizona Department of Corrections and WALLACE, Unknown; Deputy Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH CHARLES SLUSHER
Ricky Sabin v. Ernest Trujillo, et al
as 14-16594
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY LEE SABIN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNEST TRUJILLO and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Trujillo et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
Yukimi Trujillo and Ernest Trujillo
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trujillo et al v. PFIZER INC
as TXN/3:14-cv-00518
Plaintiff:
Yukimi Trujillo and Ernest Trujillo
Defendant:
PFIZER INC
Trujillo et al v. PFIZER INC
as 3:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Yukimi Trujillo and Ernest Trujillo
Defendant:
PFIZER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armando Aros v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16242
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN TREVINO, Sergeant, K. PLAUSNER, Administrator, UNKNOWN VALENZUELA, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS
Armando Aros v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, GEORGE HERMAN, STGVC Chairperson, JEFFREY FREELAND, Deputy Warden and others
Armando Aros v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, GEORGE HERMAN, STGVC Chairperson, JEFFREY FREELAND, Deputy Warden and others
John Sansing v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-99001
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD SANSING
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and ERNEST TRUJILLO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Angel Medrano v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-15004
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL MAYORA MEDRANO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, TERRY L. STEWART, Director and ERNEST TRUJILLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
