Patterson v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 3, 2016
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35 ) is accepted and adopted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 27 ) is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/2/2016. (See attached Order for complete information)(DLC)
|November 6, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants Pima County Sheriffs Office and Sheriff Clarence Dupniks 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Defendant Pima County Sheriffs Office is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant Sheriff Clarence Dupnik is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants City of Tucson and Tucson City Attorney Michael Rankins 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Defendant Tucson City Attorney Michael Rankin is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant City of Tucson is dismissed with out prejudice. Plaintiff shall have 60 days to identify Deputies John/Jane Does 1 and 2, and to amend his complaint accordingly. The Clerk is directed to automatically dismiss this action without prejudice if Plaintiff does not comply with this instruction. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/5/14.(BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?