Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gerald Markham v. County of Pima, et al
as 19-15640
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CHRIS NANCOS, Present Sheriff, ALEX JANSEN, Deputy Sheriff # 7332 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD W. MARKHAM and GERALD MARKHAM
Wade Webb v. County of Pima, et al
as 18-16659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE TRAVIS WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CLARENCE DUPNIK, former Sheriff, CHRIS NANOS, former Sheriff and others
Webb v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Wade Travis Webb
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Clarence Dupnik, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bressi
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Supervisors, Mark Napier, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al Saud v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2016cv00544
Petitioner:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Klalid Bin Talal Al Saud
Respondent:
Clarence Dupnik, Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Markham v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Gerald Markham
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cagle #079874 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Shaine Carl Cagle
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aziz v. Schwartz et al
as 4:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
Thamer Mohammed Aziz
Defendant:
Tory Schwartz, Terry Parrish, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Eva Jackson and Amber Jackson
Defendant:
Clarence Dupnik, Jeffrey Reay, Joe Louie Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cagle #079874 v. Dupnik et al
as 2:2014cv02616
Plaintiff:
Shaine Carl Cagle
Defendant:
Clarence Dupnik, Unknown Party, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
