Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors et al
| Terrence Bressi |
| Pima County Board of Supervisors, Mark Napier, Clarence Dupnik, Christopher Nanos, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Ryan Roher, Brian Kunze, Unknown Parties, Unknown Fuentes, E Lopez, Unknown Frye, Unknown Potter and Unknown Grayson |
| 4:2018cv00186 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| David C Bury |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
ORDER that the Motion to Stay (Doc. 192 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall deposit the amount of $1,007.35 with the Clerk of the Court as a cash supersedeas bond to stay enforcement of the judgment while an appeal of this matter is pending in the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/10/22. (See attached Order for complete details) (JAM)
|
|
Filing
185
ORDER denying 104 Plaintiff's *First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 135 Pima County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 136 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 146 Federal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment, accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 1/3/2022. (See attached Order for complete details) (REM)
|
|
Filing
68
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties abide by the schedule and rules in the Order. Discovery due by 2/12/2021. Dispositive motions due by 3/12/2021. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/12/2021. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 5/15/2020. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
|
|
Filing
64
AMENDED ORDER the Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant Nanos is dismissed from this action. Count I, the injunctive and declaratory relief claims are dismissed and Defendants Napier, Nanos, and PCBS a re dismissed, and Defendant Napier is dismissed from Count IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there shall be no further amendments of the First Amended Complaint, and the Defendants shall file an Answer within 21 days of the filing date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/3/2020. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/17/2020. (See attached PDF for complete details) (DLC)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 46 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant Nanos is dismissed from this action in its entirety. Count I, the injunctive and declaratory relief claims are dismissed and Defendants Napi er, Nanos, and PCBS are dismissed, and Defendant Napier is dismissed from Count IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there shall be no further amendments of the First Amended Complaint, and the Defendants shall file an Answer within 21 days of the filing date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/3/2020. (See attached PDF for complete details)(DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
