Ramage v. United States of America et al
|Unknown Jackshaw, Unknown Gomez, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Unknown Mendoza and Unknown Parties
|June 5, 2014
|US District Court for the District of Arizona
|Tucson Division Office
|Cindy K Jorgenson
|Nature of Suit:
|Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 9, 2014
ORDERED that this matter is dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 12/8/2014. (BAR)
|September 22, 2014
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Ramage's FTCA claim, as set forth in claim 1 of the Complaint, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against Defendants BOP, Gomez, Jackshaw, Mendoza, the Warden and 1- 10 Unknown Def endants. Ramages deliberate indifference claim, as set forth in Claim 2 of the Complaint, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against Defendants United States, BOP, and the Warden. Ramage's deliberate indifference claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUD ICE against 1-10 Unknown Defendants. Ramage SHALL HAVE 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. As an alternative to the deadline for the filing of an Amended Complaint, Ramage shall arrange for service of the original Complaint and a copy of this Order upon Defendant United States within 60 days from the date of filing of this Order (see attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/19/2014. (MFR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?