Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Murray v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Murray
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa, County of, Unknown Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Yeager et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Valerie Yeager, Clifford Yeager and Kathleen Yeager
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Jose Mendoza, Unknown Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Murray v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Murray
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Party and Unknown Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lallande v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Lallande, IV
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Croppack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ligidakis #198493 v. Stickley et al
as 2:2021cv01100
Defendant:
Lori Stickley, Unknown Jordan, C Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nicholas Ligidakis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02621
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Unknown Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo G Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hummert #89109 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01840
Plaintiff:
Steven Henry Hummert
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Lance Hetmer, Stacey Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv03892
Plaintiff:
Bryce W Smith
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Mendoza, Unknown Wiehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villovos v. Ennis et al
as 2:2017cv03303
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos Villovos
Defendant:
Jeremy Ennis, Unknown Mendoza and Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02830
Plaintiff:
Bryce W Smith
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Paul Penzone, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
