Safari Club International v. Jewell, et al.
Plaintiff: Safari Club International
Defendant: Sally Jewell, United States Department of Interior, Daniel M Ashe and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Case Number: 4:2016cv00094
Filed: February 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jennifer G Zipps
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDERED that Federal Defendants' Motion to Modify Deadline for Completion of Remand (Doc. 267) is GRANTED in (CV 15-19-TUC-JGZ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's Order (Doc. 215 in CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ and Doc. 106 in CV-16-00 094-TUC-JGZ) and Final Judgment (Doc. 244 in CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ and Doc. 112 in CV-16-00094-TUC-JGZ) are MODIFIED as follows: Federal Defendants shall have thirty-nine (39) months to issue a final, revised 10(j) rule in accordance with the Court's March 31, 2018 Order. Federal Defendants shall issue the final rule on or before July 1, 2022. (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 4/27/2021. (MCO)
March 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED in lead case CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, Plaintiff CBD's 114 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein. Federal Defendants' 123 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant-Intervenor Arizona's 129 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. In consolidated case CV-15-00285-TUC-JGZ, Plaintiff WEG's Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 111 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein. Federal Defendants' 133 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 133) is DENIED. Defendant-Intervenor Arizona's 141 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 141) is DENIED . In consolidated case No. CV-15-00179-TUC-JGZ, Plaintiff the Coalition's Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 108 ) is DENIED. Federal Defendants 137 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 137) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein. Defendant-Intervenor CBD's 147 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (CV-15-00019-TUC-JGZ, doc. 147) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein. Plaintiff SCI' s 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Federal Defendants 70 Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part; Defendant-Intervenor CBD's 78 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied i n part. The 1/16/15 final rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 2512, et seq., is REMANDED to the Service for further action consistent with this order. The final rule shall remain in effect until the Service issues a new final rule for experimental population of Mexi can gray wolves, or otherwise remedies the deficiencies identified in this Order, at which time the 1/16/15 final rule will be superseded. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, parties shall provide to the Court a proposed deadline for publication of a revised 10(j) rulemaking or other remedial action. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 3/31/2018. (BAR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Safari Club International v. Jewell, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Safari Club International
Represented By: Jeremy Evan Clare
Represented By: Anna Margo Seidman
Represented By: Nathan E Winger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sally Jewell
Represented By: Bridget Kennedy McNeil
Represented By: Tanya Camille Nesbitt
Represented By: Andrew Allen Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Interior
Represented By: Bridget Kennedy McNeil
Represented By: Tanya Camille Nesbitt
Represented By: Andrew Allen Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel M Ashe
Represented By: Bridget Kennedy McNeil
Represented By: Tanya Camille Nesbitt
Represented By: Andrew Allen Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Represented By: Bridget Kennedy McNeil
Represented By: Tanya Camille Nesbitt
Represented By: Andrew Allen Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?