Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Phoenix Herpetological Society v. FWS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5161
Plaintiff / Appellant: Phoenix Herpetological Society, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: Ryan Zinke, Secretary, in his official capacity, Daniel M. Ashe, Former Director, in his then-official capacity, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
American Stewards of Liberty, et al v. Department of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-50321
Not Yet Classified: JOHN YEARWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, MARGARET E. EVERSON, in her official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, BENJAMIN N. TUGGLE, in his official capacity as the Southwest Regional Director of the USFWS, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 18-15041
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-17547
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant - Appellant: RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
RYDER et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02584
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN RYDER and RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DANIEL M. ASHE and RYAN ZINKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Daniel Ashe, et al
as 17-35859
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior and RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Deparment of the Interior
Center for Environmental Law v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 17-35548
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Dave Irving, et al
as 17-35329
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant - Appellee: DAVE IRVING, in his official capacity as the Manager of the Leavenworth Fisheries Complex, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al
as 17-55428
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Audubon Society of Portland et al v. Jewell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00069
Defendant: Daniel M. Ashe, Sally Jewell and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff: Audubon Society of Portland, Oregon Wild and WaterWatch of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?