Jonassen v. Shartle

Jonassen v. Shartle

Petitioner:	Martin Jonassen
Respondent:	Unknown Shartle
Case Number:	4:2017cv00284
Filed:	June 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline M Rateau (PS)
Presiding Judge:	David C Bury
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2019	Filing 70 Ordered that the Court does not issue a Certificate of Appealabilty in this Appeal Re: the denial of Plaintiffs request to renew his Motion for Reconsideration. It is ordered that all pending motions ( 63 and 68 ) are STRICKEN. It is further ord ered that the Plaintiff shall not make any further filings in this case unless or until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should issue a Certificate of Appealability and then remand it for further proceedings. Ordered that pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event the Plaintiff files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/6/2019. (BAR)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2019

Filing 70 Ordered that the Court does not issue a Certificate of Appealabilty in this Appeal Re: the denial of Plaintiffs request to renew his Motion for Reconsideration. It is ordered that all pending motions ( 63 and 68 ) are STRICKEN. It is further ord ered that the Plaintiff shall not make any further filings in this case unless or until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should issue a Certificate of Appealability and then remand it for further proceedings. Ordered that pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event the Plaintiff files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/6/2019. (BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jonassen v. Shartle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Martin Jonassen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown Shartle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?