Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MR. PERKINS
JONASSEN et al v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
B.O.P., U.S. and MR. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonassen v. True et al
as 3:2020cv00238
Defendant:
William True, Mark Inch, Donald Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 19-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, STANGL, WYNN, USP Tuscon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant:
LAUREN HOLLEY, Marshal, NEAMTU, CO, USP Tucson, GREG THIEL, Marshal and others
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 18-16621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Martin Jonassen v. J. Shartle
as 18-16364
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Martin Jonassen v. J. Shartle
as 18-15809
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Oden et al v. True et al
as 3:2018cv00600
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Oden, Daryl Hampton, Jason Nielson and others
Defendant:
William B. True, Donald Boyce, Jeff Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 17-17420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN MARCUM, CO, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
