Brisco v. Shinn et al
Antjuan Brisco |
L Palmer-Keefe, Unknown Rochester, Yolanda Elliott, Unknown Duran, Unknown Roberts, Unknown Cota, David Shinn, Unknown Villicana and Unknown Party |
4:2020cv00260 |
June 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Jennifer G Zipps |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 *NOTICE of Appearance and Waiver of Service for Defendant Villicana by Paul Edward Carter on behalf of Unknown Villicana. (Carter, Paul) *Modified to clarify docket text on 8/5/2020 (MFR). |
Filing 7 SEALED LODGED Proposed Last Known Address for Defendant Duran. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation to Seal is granted. Filed by David Shinn. (Carter, Paul) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re: Filing Under Seal Last Known Address of Defendant Duran by David Shinn re: #5 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief . (Carter, Paul) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting in part #4 Motion Requesting Court Order for Defendant's to Provide the Badge Numbers and Addresses to the United States Marshal. The Court requests that counsel for Defendant Shinn provide to the Court, under seal, within ten (10) days, Defendant Duran's and Villicana's work address or, if no longer employed by the Arizona Department of Corrections, Defendants' last known home address. Upon receipt of the addresses for Defendants, the Clerk of the Court shall complete a service packet and forward the packets to the United States Marshal Service. Service shall be made within 60 days of the filing date of this Order. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to Paul Carter, Assistant Attorney General. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 7/29/2020. (See attached Order for complete details) (DLC) |
Filing 4 MOTION Requesting Court Order for Defendant's to Provide the Badge Numbers and Addresses to the United States Marshal by Antjuan Brisco. (4 pages) (DLC) |
Filing 3 ORDER (Service Packet): Defendants Shinn, Palmer-Keefe, Unknown Transportation Supervisor, Elliott, Cota, Rochester, and Roberts are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Duran and Villicana must answer the Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 1-3 at 2-10), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Duran and Villicana. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/22/2020. (DLC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pima County Superior Court, case number C20201723. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18389962 filed by David Shinn. (Carter, Paul) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-B)(BAC) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Office of the Attorney General(Elizabeth Wright) on 5/13/2020. (Original filed in Pima County Superior Court on 5/20/2020.(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.