Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brisco v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-3331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTJUAN BRISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, UNKNOWN DURAN, COII, Correctional Transport Van Driver, UNKNOWN VILLICANA, COII, Correctional Transport Van Driver and others
Kirby v. Cota et al
as 4:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Kirby
Defendant:
Unknown Cota, Unknown Bradley, Unknown Maganelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Beyond Food LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Tillman Robinson
Defendant:
Beyond Food LLC, Santiago Cota and Unknown Cota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisco v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00260
Defendant:
L Palmer-Keefe, Unknown Rochester, Yolanda Elliott and others
Plaintiff:
Antjuan Brisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
R D Moore
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, D Karas, Unknown Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrada v. Cota et al
as 2:2015cv00818
Plaintiff:
Israel Estrada
Defendant:
Juan R Cota and Unknown Cota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Huerta v. Cota et al
as 2:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Sergio Huerta
Defendant:
Juan R Cota and Unknown Cota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cook v. Hawthorne et al
as 2:2011cv02410
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Yarrow Cook
Defendant:
Unknown Hawthorne, Unknown Cota, Unknown Mallelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
