Bell v. Mercury Casualty Company et al
Plaintiff: Ryan Bell
Defendant: Mercury Casualty Company and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 4:2023cv00414
Filed: August 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Soto
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The parties must comply with LRCiv 12.1(c) in regards to motions to dismiss. If any Defendant files a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c) and if Plaintiff contends any further amendment of the Complaint can cure any alleged deficiency, Plaintiff must submit, no later than the time Plaintiff files a response to a motion to dismiss, a proposed amended complaint containing all further allegations Plaintiff could make. (See attached Order for complete details.) Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/7/23. (MYE)
September 5, 2023 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Mercury Casualty Company.(Crocchi, Steven)
September 1, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE re: Confirmation of Filing Notice of Removal with State Court by Mercury Casualty Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Crocchi, Steven)
August 30, 2023 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22255665. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Soto. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-414-TUC-JAS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
August 30, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mercury Casualty Company. (Crocchi, Steven) (JAM)
August 30, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cochise County Superior Court, case number S0200CV202300333. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22255665 filed by Mercury Casualty Company. (Crocchi, Steven) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM)
August 30, 2023 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: 2 sets of a Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration and Civil Cover Sheet upon Mercury Casualty Company on 7/28/23. (Original filed in Cochise County Superior Court on 8/4/23.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Mercury Casualty Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Bell
Represented By: Robert David Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercury Casualty Company
Represented By: Matthew Gregory Kleiner
Represented By: Steven Daniel Crocchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?