Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Defendant:
IAN GUSTAFSON, STEPHEN HAGGERTY, COLBY HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Mercury Casualty Company et al
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bell
Defendant:
Mercury Casualty Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
ZIMMERMAN v. LEEK et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
CAMERON JAMES ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
DANIEL J. LEEK, RYAN BELL, LIEUTENANT JORDAN KITCHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Shirley Anderson v. City of Daytona Beach Municipal, et al
as 23-11259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIRLEY BAKER ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH MUNICIPAL, RYAN BELL, SUNTRUST MORTGAGE OF VIRGINIA and others
BELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
RYAN BELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bell v. Sims et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Philip Ryan Bell
Defendant:
Charlie Sims, Terrell Carson and Chenetta Cains
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
