Spiro Kamar et al v. Radio Shack Corporation et al
| Joevanny Solorio, Eric Velasco, Terral James Smith, Spiro Kamar, James Mitchell and Ariann Partida |
| Radio Shack Corporation and Does |
| 2:2007cv02252 |
| April 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| A Howard Matz |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court regrets that it still cannot sign the proposed order granting preliminary approval, because the class notice and the proposed order require further clarification and correction. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
149
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Unless the parties comply by 12 p.m. tomorrow with the previous requirement that they file the changes to the Settlement Agreement and Class Notice, the Court will deny preliminary approval and send this case to the wheel immediately. (smo)
|
|
Filing
124
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. Before the Court is Defendant RadioShack Corporation's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Interpretation of California's Reporting Time Pay Regulation. Because a depublished case does not constitute intervening new authority, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion for reconsideration. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
123
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz re Status Report 122 : Court lifts stay and takes defendants' motion for reconsideration under submission. (se)
|
|
Filing
63
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: NOTICE OF ERRATA RE. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT RADIOSHACK CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 39 . The Court issues this order to correct the sentence on page 17, lines 1-4 of the ruling at Document 39 that starts with "Put another way,...." The sentence is corrected to read: "Put another way, the fact that meal and rest break premiums were placed within Article 1 does not demonstrate that the Legislature intended to deprive workers of access to the courts to recover other legally mandated wages, such as those at issue here." (jp)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court rules on the parties' evidentiary objections to evidence submitted for class certification (see document for further details). (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
