Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Hernandez v. Radio Shack Corporation
as 5:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hernandez
Defendant:
Radio Shack Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
David Frazier v. Radio Shack Corporation
as 14-30333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Spiro Kamar, et al v. Radio Shack Corporation
as 13-57157
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPIRO KAMAR, individual, on behalf of themselves and all other simiarly situated, JAMES MITCHELL, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, ARIANN PARTIDA, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
ANTONIO BOATNER, Jr.
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Parks v. AT&T Mobility, et al
as 13-6090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLIE PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC and RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BANKS et al v. RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BANKS and JONICE M. WILSON
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera-Clemente v. Radio Shack Corporation
as 3:2012cv01782
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rivera-Clemente
Defendant:
Radio Shack Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
