Michael T. White v. Michael J. Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Michael T. White v. Michael J. Astrue

Michael T. White v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Michael T White
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2008cv08389
Filed:	December 18, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	AstrueBRUnassigned
Presiding Judge:	Chapman
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2010	Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman. Fees awarded to Laura Krank in the amount of $ $3000.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 ; Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Acce ss to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay to Laura Krank, as Plaintiffs assignee and subject to the reservation of rights, the amount of THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (jy)
January 27, 2010	Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman; IT IS ORDERED that: (1) plaintiffs request for relief is granted; and (2) the Commissioners decision is reversed, and the action is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Judgment shall be entered accordingly. See order for further details. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2010

Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman. Fees awarded to Laura Krank in the amount of $ $3000.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 ; Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Acce ss to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay to Laura Krank, as Plaintiffs assignee and subject to the reservation of rights, the amount of THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (jy)

January 27, 2010

Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman; IT IS ORDERED that: (1) plaintiffs request for relief is granted; and (2) the Commissioners decision is reversed, and the action is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Judgment shall be entered accordingly. See order for further details. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael T. White v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael T White
Represented By:	Laura Lackey-Krank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?