Stella Velasco et al v. The United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS) et al
| Stella Velasco, Chynna Velasco and C. V. |
| The United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS), F. Gerard Heinauer, Michael Aytes, Janet Napolitano and Eric Holder, Jr. |
| 2:2009cv01341 |
| February 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| alBRUnassigned |
| Judge |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. Pursuant to the order of the Ninth Circuit filed on October 7, 2011, and this case having been remanded to this Court, the Court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction. The case may be closed. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 17 . Because the Court finds that the USCIS's interpretation of 8 USC 1255 was neither arbitrary nor capricious, it follows that Defendants properly denied Plaintiffs' applications for adjustment of status. Accordingly, there are no triable issues left to be resolved, and the Court GRANTS Defendants' request for summary judgment. Defendants shall file a "Proposed" Judgment withint seven (7) days of this Order. This Order is not intended for publication or for inclusion in the databases of Westlaw or LEXIS. (jp)
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: On 7/13/2009, the parties file a Joint Status Report stating that the "will file Cross Motion for Summary Judgment by or on 8/3/2009," (see attached Minute Order for further information). The Court thus ORDERS that only Plaintiffs may move for summary judgment. They shall do so on or before 8/3/2009. Defendants in their opposition papers can assert the bases for why they think judgment should be entered for them. (jp)
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: On 6/19/2009, the Court denied the government MOTION to Dismiss this action for Lack of Jurisdiction 8 . In light of the procedure and practice of the immigration court in these two cases, the Court O RDERS the parties to file a second joint status report by not later than 7/13/2009 suggesting an accelerated briefing schedule on the merits of this action. If the government wishes to represent that the Court should not pursue an accelerated schedule because even if the Court ultimately remands this matter to the USCIS for reconsideration, the deportation proceedings will not in fact be terminated, it may do so in the joint status report. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
