Dereck Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc. et al
| Dereck Seltzer |
| Frank Edwin Wright, III, Warner Bros. Records Inc., Michael Ryan Pritchard, Infect Productions, Green Day, Inc., Green Day, Green Day Touring, Inc., Geen Day, Billie Joe Armstrong, Does and Roger Staub |
| 2:2010cv02103 |
| March 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES (DEFENDANT ROGER STAUB) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Motino of Defendant Roger Staub, individually, and Roger Staub d/b/a Infect Productions ("Roger Staub") for Award of Attorney's Fees havi ng come on regularly before this Court, the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge presiding, and the evidence and argument of counsel having been fully considered and the Court having entered its Order granting that Motion, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Roger Staub shall recover from Plaintiff Dereck Seltzer $22,340 in attorney's fees. (bm)
|
|
Filing
139
JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Motion of defendants Green Day, Inc., Green Day Touring, Inc., Billie Joe Armstrong, Frank Edwin Wright, III, Michael Pritchard and Warner Bros. Records Inc.for Award of Attorney s Fees having come on regularly before this Court, theHonorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge presiding, and the evidence and argument of counsel having been fully considered and the Court having entered its Order granting that Motion, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant Green Day, Inc. have and recover from plaintiff Dereck Seltzer $128,392.50 in attorney's fees. (ir)
|
|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Geen Day, Green Day, Green Day Touring, Inc., Green Day, Inc., Infect Productions, Performance Environmental Design, Warner Bros. Records Inc., Billie Joe Armstrong, Frank Edwin Wright, III, Michael Ryan Pritchard, Roger Staub against Dereck Seltzer: The Motion of defendants Green Day, Inc., Green Day Touring, Inc., Billie Joe Armstrong, Frank Edwin Wright, III, Michael Pritchard and Warner Bros. Records Inc. for Summary Judgment, in which Motio n the other defendants joined, having come on regularly before this Court, the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge presiding, and the evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly rendered on August 18, 2011, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Dereck Seltzer take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that defendants recover their costs from plaintiff. (bm)
|
|
Filing
100
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez GRANTING 51 Defendants' motion for summary judgment in favor of Geen Day, Green Day, Green Day Touring, Inc., Green Day, Inc., Infect Productions, Performance Environmental Design, Warne r Bros. Records Inc., Billie Joe Armstrong, Frank Edwin Wright, III, Michael Ryan Pritchard, Roger Staub against Dereck Seltzer: In sum, for reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (see document for further details) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (bm)
|
|
Filing
40
FIRST AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order 39 . **See Order for details.** (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
