Cases 1 - 10 of 1,524
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 22-1451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ARISTA MUSIC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NONESUCH RECORDS INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
CULMER v. WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01683
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMET and ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johannsongs-Publishing, Ltd. v. Rolf Lovland, et al
as 20-55552
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLF LOVLAND, DOES, 1-20, UMG RECORDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHANNSONGS-PUBLISHING, LTD.
Leonard Williams, et al v. Warner Music Group Corporation, et al
as 20-55419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD WILLIAMS, an individual and THE LENNY WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY, a California corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 2-10
Leonard Williams, et al v. Warner Music Group Corporation, et al
as 20-80052
Petitioner:
LEONARD WILLIAMS, an individual and THE LENNY WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY, a California corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 2-10
Leonard Williams, et al v. Warner Music Group Corporation, et al
as 19-56121
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEONARD WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and THE LENNY WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Leonard Williams, et al v. Warner Music Group Corporation, et al
as 19-80052
Not Yet Classified:
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, THE LENNY WILLIAMS PRODUCTION COMPANY, a California corporation, WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
