UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Tofig Kurbanov
| DOES 1-10, d/b/a FLVTO.BIZ, a/k/a 2CONV.COM |
| UMG RECORDINGS, INCORPORATED, CAPITAL RECORDS, INCORPORATED, WARNER RECORDS, INC., f/k/a Warner Bros. Records, Inc., ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INCORPORATED, FUELED BY RAMEN LLC, NONESUCH RECORDS INC., SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INCORPORATED, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT US LATIN LLC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC, LAFACE RECORDS LLC and ZOMBA RECORDING LLC |
| TOFIG KURBANOV |
| 23-1774 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-00957-CMH-TCB. [1001417140] [23-1774] RP [Entered: 08/08/2023 03:32 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 4 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001417134] [23-1774] RP [Entered: 08/08/2023 03:30 PM]
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/STIPULATION by Tofig Kurbanov to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [4] [1001416958] [23-1774] Jeffrey Geiger [Entered: 08/08/2023 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-00957-CMH-TCB.. [1001409274] [23-1774] RP [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Attorney Matthew Lloyd Haws and Michael Keith Lowman for appellees in 23-1774 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001409260] [23-1774] RP [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-00957-CMH-TCB. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001409250] [23-1774] RP [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
