Ronald Holcomb Jr. v. Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Ronald Holcomb, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2010cv03906
Filed: May 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Related to: Memorandum Decision 21 , Complaint - (Social Security) 3 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronald Holcomb Jr. v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Geralyn A Gulseth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Holcomb, Jr.
Represented By: Bill LaTour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?