Brittany Morrison v. Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Brittany Morrison
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2010cv04564
Filed: June 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, in favor of Brittany Morrison against Michael J. Astrue Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 31 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law and with the Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brittany Morrison v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Jeffrey T Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Morrison
Represented By: Patricia L McCabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?