Tatiana Lopez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Miguel Amarillas and Tatiana Lopez |
| Chris Branuelas, Lt. Chris Branuelas, County of Los Angeles, Does, F. Enriquez, Deputy F. Enriquez, S. Kalassay, Det. S. Kalassay, Javier Martinez and Deputy Javier Martinez |
| 2:2010cv08926 |
| November 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: The COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT (COUNTY) will produce, pursuant to the Courts Order of April 17, 2012, copies of Personnel Performance Index (PPI) Data Documents for Deputy Francisco Enriquez, Detective Scott Kalassay, Deputy Javier Martinez and Lieutenant Chris Branuelas, documents deemed confidential, under California state law, i.e., personnel records of Peace Officers Francisco Enriquez, Scott Kalassay, Javier Martinez and Lieutenant Chris Branuelas. See Cal. Pen Code §§ 832.7. The documents are further produced pursuant to the privacy considerations recognized by the federal court subject to a stipulated protective order. See Kelly v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 653, 656 (N.D. Cal. 1987; Miller v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292, 300 (C.D. Cal. 1992). re Stipulation for Protective Order 83 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
|
Filing
24
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties and, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED THAT, 1. The PROTECTED DOCUMENTS shall be used solely in connection with the preparation and trial of this action, CASE NO. CV 10-8926 PSG (CWx), or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose, including any other litigation. This paragraph shall not preclude the Plaintiffs' or Defendants' attorneys of record in this case from indica ting, in connection with discovery or a discovery motion in another action, an awareness of responsive documents. In indicating such awareness in any other action, the Plaintiffs' and Defendants' attorney of record shall not disclose the substance of the Confidential Information. re Stipulation for Protective Order 23 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
