Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marker v. New Mexico House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Larry Marker
Respondent:
New Mexico House of Representatives, Eliseo Alcon, Anthony Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Stephens County, et al
as 24-6016
Plaintiff:
J.T. RICH
Defendant:
STEPHENS COUNTY, DEXTER LAWLEY, individual capacity as captain and internal affairs officer, CHEYENNE UNDERWOOD, individual capacity as Public Defender for Stephens County and others
Renteria v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Nelida Renteria
Defendant:
Javier Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
USA v. Francisco Martinez-Vasquez
as 24-10214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ
Williams v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
