Jong Man Kim et al v. Eric H Holder Jr et al
Jong Man Kim, Myung Joon Kim and Myung Hee Yoon |
Jane Arellano, Eric H Holder, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas and Janet Napolitano |
2:2011cv04869 |
June 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Other Immigration Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's entire action, including all claims, is dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) |
Filing 14 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In the present case, it appears that plaintiffs relief sought in their complaint for writ of mandamus has been adjudicated by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on 8/16/20 11. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 9/8/2011 why this action should not be dismissed as moot. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order wi ll stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.