Trish Alsalaymeh v. Janet Napolitano et al
| Trish Alsalaymeh |
| Does, Janet Napolitano and United States of America Department of Justice |
| 2:2012cv02474 |
| March 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| S. James Otero |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 44 by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS SO ORDERED that pursuant to the separately filed Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs and fees. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this action for one hundred-eighty (180) days from the date of the filing of this Order for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff is not cleared to work following the background investigation referenced in the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, and if she is therefore unable to be hired by the Department of Homeland Security, then upon formal request by either party, the Court shall deem the settlement agreement null and void, this dismissal shall be vacated, and the Court shall reinstate this action, setting new dates for a motion hearing cut-off, pretrial conference, and trial. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
