Tracy Anne Bedsaul v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Tracy Anne Bedsaul v. Michael J Astrue

Tracy Anne Bedsaul v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Tracy Anne Bedsaul
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv02527
Filed:	March 23, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 21, 2013	Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaint iff's counsel, as Plaintiff's assignee, shall be awarded attorney fees under EAJA in the amount of six thousand dollars and zero cents ($6,000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (mp)
September 23, 2013	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 20 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that judgment is entered for the Plaintiff and that this action is remanded to the Commissioner for payment of benefits for the period beginning April 3, 2009, and for further proceedings as to whether to make representative payments and selection of a representative payee, as appropriate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 21, 2013

Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaint iff's counsel, as Plaintiff's assignee, shall be awarded attorney fees under EAJA in the amount of six thousand dollars and zero cents ($6,000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (mp)

September 23, 2013

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 20 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that judgment is entered for the Plaintiff and that this action is remanded to the Commissioner for payment of benefits for the period beginning April 3, 2009, and for further proceedings as to whether to make representative payments and selection of a representative payee, as appropriate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tracy Anne Bedsaul v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Anne Bedsaul
Represented By:	Joel D Leidner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?