Colgems EMI Music Inc et al v. Mediterranean Gourmet Inc et al
| Colgems EMI Music Inc, Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc, WB Music Corp and Warner Bros Inc |
| Mediterranean Gourmet Inc and Vittorio Romeo |
| 2:2012cv05532 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Upon Stipulation 20 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs Colgems EMI Music, Inc., Warner Bros., Inc., WB Music Corp., and Universal Polygram Internation al Publishing, Inc. and against Defendants Mediterranean Gourmet, Inc. and Vittorio Romeo on the claims set forth in Plaintiffs' Complaint in the amount $10,000.00. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties have agreed that this Judgment m ay be satisfied upon Defendants' payment of the sum of $7,800.00. Contemporaneously with the filing of this Consent Judgment, ASCAP shall offer to Defendants, and Defendants shall accept and execute, an ASCAP General License Agreement for Romeo Cucina for the license term commencing 4/1/2013 at the currently applicable annual license fee rate. See document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
