Peli Popovich Hunt et al v. Horwitz Cron and Armstrong LLP et al
| Peli Popovich Hunt |
| Daniel A Lev, Eliisa D Miller, Paul R Pearlson, Judge Ernest M Robles, James R Selth, David Gould, Horwitz Cron and Armstrong LLP, Weintraub and Selth APC, John R Armstrong, David M Goodrich and doe 1 to doe 10 |
| 2:2012cv07866 |
| September 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal 93 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
90
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: By order dated 7/8/2013, this Court dismissed this action with prejudice against defendants United States of America, Miller, Lev, Goodrich, Gould, Selth, Pearlson, and Weintraub & Selth APC. The Co urt declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction against plaintiff's remaining claims against defendants Armstrong and Horwitz, Cron & Armstrong, LLP. On 8/30/2013, plaintiff Peli Popovich Hunt filed a "Request for Entry of Judgment," ; pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rules 59, 77, and 79 87 . The Court's order dated 7/8/2013, dismissing this action with prejudice as to the moving defendants, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims asserted against the remaining defendants, suffices as a final order in this case. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing
84
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss 53 , Defendants Miller and Lev's Motion to Dismiss 54 , Defendants Goodrich and Gould's Motion t o Dismiss 55 , and Defendants Pearlson, Selth, Weintraub & Selth APC's Motion to Dismiss 58 . Moreover, plaintiff has not demonstrated that she could cure the deficiencies identified herein and in the Court's prior order granting defendan ts' motions to dismiss, for despite the Court's detailed instructions, plaintiff has failed to allege facts supporting viable claims for relief. Accordingly, dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE as to defendants' United States of America, W&S, Selth, Pearlson, Goodrich, Gould, Miller, and Lev. In addition, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining claims against defendants HC&A and Armstrong. Accordingly, these claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
43
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS (filed March 19, 2013) [Dkt. No. 30] by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS defendant United States of America's motion to dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiff may amend her complaint as to the claims asserted against the United States on or before May 1, 2013. (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
