Cases 1 - 10 of 35
David Gould et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
as 8:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
David Gould, Kaushik Iyengar and John Nixon
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gould v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Gould v. Cerebral, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
David Gould
Defendant:
Cerebral, Inc., Cerebral Medical Group, P.A. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Gould v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
David Gould
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barak Federman v. Cerebral, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Barak Federman
Defendant:
Cerebral, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
John Doe, Lyndell Johnson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 23-15118
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP. and DAVID GOULD
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
Debra Charles v. Anna-Jonesboro National Bank, et al
as 22-3261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA A. CHARLES
Defendant / Appellee:
A-J NATIONAL BANK, DAVID GOULD, SCOTT WILSON and others
Gould v. Duarte
as 22-1943
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GOULD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID DUARTE, Superintendent, MTC
Goulding et al v. Miller
as 1:2022cv05224
Plaintiff:
David Goulding, Howard Salamon, Robyn Goulding and others
Defendant:
mark Miller
Charles v. A-J National Bank et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Charles
Defendant:
A-J National Bank, David Gould, Scott Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
