Melike Dewey v. Adams et al
| Melike Dewey |
| Adams and Thompson |
| 2:2012cv09493 |
| November 6, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Duty Magistrate Judge |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Pursuant to the order accepting magistrate judges report and recommendations, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and follow Court orders. 92 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER ACCEPTING ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTGRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Ju dge Valerie Baker Fairbank. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation 79 is ACCEPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. 3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted with respect to all of plaintiff� 39;s claims apart from her claims of the excessive use of force during her arrest. 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied with respect to plaintiff's claims arising from the excessive use of force during her arrest. 5. The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record. **See Order for details.** (ch)
|
|
Filing
16
(IN CHAMBERS) MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to this Court's Order of February 19, 2013, each party was ordered to file a Status Report no later than May 20, 2013. To date, the Court has not received a Status Repor t from plaintiff. Accordingly, no later than June 6, 2013, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Filing of the Status Report by plaintiff on or before June 6, 2013, shall be deemed compliance by the filing party with this Order to Show Cause. (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
