Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mahmoud v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2026cv01886
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. John v. City of Conroe et al
as 4:2026cv04952
Plaintiff:
Shaun Nicholas St. John
Defendant:
City of Conroe, A Bell, Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. SumiRiko Ohio, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01431
Plaintiff:
Timmy Adams
Defendant:
SumiRiko Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dunn v. Colson
as 1:2026cv02505
Plaintiff:
Megan Dunn
Defendant:
Adam Colson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Patriot Growth Insurance Services, LLC v. Bradley & Parker, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv03781
Plaintiff:
PATRIOT GROWTH INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
Bradley & Parker, Inc., ADAM GURDUS and ABC Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Abdur-Rahman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv05288
Plaintiff:
Deidhra Abdur-Rahman, Chris B Acker, Rafael Acosta and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
ABC IP, LLC, et al., v. Hawkphin Sales, LLC, et al.
as 4:2026cv00707
Plaintiff:
ABC IP, LLC, Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. and RBTM LLC
Defendant:
Hawkphin Sales, LLC doing business as Blackhawk Armory doing business as Battle Optics doing business as Battle Shop doing business as Battle Shops doing business as Lakefront Armory and Adam Gerleman
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Adams v. The Hertz Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv00179
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Adams
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation and Edward Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
