Cases 1 - 10 of 1,578
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikhael et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03368
Plaintiff:
Marleen Youel Mikhael and Tema Zya Adam
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Markel American Insurance Company v. Ulanski et al
as 1:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jason Ulanski, Eliasard Alcauter, Jacob Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Franco v. Thrush
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Adam Franco
Defendant:
Shawn Thrush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sokol v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2024cv02907
Plaintiff:
ADAM SOKOL
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Pacific Rail Services, LLC
Cross Defendant:
NORTIA LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
