Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Giancarlo Aguilera et al
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant: Giancarlo Aguilera and Chilenazo
Case Number: 2:2012cv09757
Filed: November 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS GIANCARLO AGUILERA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHILENAZO; AND CHILENAZO, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY D/B/A CHILENAZO by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr.: Upon Stipulation [ 25], that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against GIANCARLO AGUILERA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHILENAZO; AND CHILENAZO, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY D/B/A CIDLENAZO and subject to the Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by 1/14/2014, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.4l(a)(l). Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr.: Thomas P. Riley is Ordered to Show Cause why the Court should not impose sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for filing complaints re SACV 12-01748 TJH (PLAx), SACV 12-01945 TJH (PLAx) , SA 12-01991 TJH (PLAx), SACV 12-01995 TJH (PLAx), CV 12-09757 TJH (PLAx) CV 13-03887 TJH (PLAx), and CV 13-03907 TJH (PLAx) with this Court without conducting a reasonable inquiry as to the facts of the case. Hearing set for 1/13/2014 10:00 AM befo re Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. It is further Ordered that counsel Show Cause why the Court should not report the matter to the Attorney Disciplinary Committee of the Central District and the California State Bar. It is further Ordered that plaintiff S how Cause as to why the Court should not dismiss cases CV 13-03887 TJH (PLAx) and CV 13-03907 TJH (PLAx) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's response to this order, if any, shall be filed and served on or before 12/30/2013. Defendants' response, if any, shall be filed and served, on or before 1/6/2014. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Giancarlo Aguilera et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Giancarlo Aguilera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chilenazo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas P Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?