Cases 1 - 10 of 455
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. CA Entertainment Corp. et al
as 6:2024cv02135
Defendant:
CA Entertainment Corp. doing business as El CityO and Carlos D. Arauz Franco
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. El Pollo Criollo et al
as 2:2024cv10055
Defendant:
Tony Elvis Bran individually doing business as Pollo Criollo doing business as Mickey's Resto Bar and El Pollo Criollo an unknown business entity doing business as Pollo Criollo doing business as Mickey's Resto Bar
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Lizcano Reyes
as 5:2024cv07917
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Lady Z. Lizcano Reyes individually and d/b/a Encanto Restaurant Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Ruiz
as 5:2024cv07241
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Benjamin Jean Ruiz d/b/a Lo Que Pueda Rodizio a/k/a Pub Colombian Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HINOSTROZA et al
as 2:2024cv09870
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
LIZANDRO DAN HINOSTROZA and EL RICO SANGUCHOM D' CHALO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Humala et al
as 3:2024cv01779
Defendant:
Marisol P. Humala Individually and d/b/a La Cueva Bar & Restaurant doing business as La Cueva Bar & Restaurant and La Cueva Bar & Restaurant
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal
Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Divisadero Sports Bar LLC et al
as 3:2024cv07214
Defendant:
Ezra David Berman individually and d/b/a San Francisco Athletic Club, Miles Munson Palliser individually and d/b/a San Francisco Athletic Club and Divisadero Sports Bar LLC an unknown business entity d/b/a San Francisco Athletic Club
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Cook et al
as 3:2024cv01833
Defendant:
Cap Entertainment Corp an unknown business entity doing business as Bluefoot Bar & Lounge and Adam Scott Cook individually doing business as Bluefoot Bar & Lounge
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Cimar Scaff et al
as 2:2024cv08801
Defendant:
Objective Enterprises an unknown business entity doing business as Silvas Brazilian Bar and Grill also known as Silvas Sports Bar and Lounge, Cimar Scaff individually doing business as Silvas Brazilian Bar and Grill also known as Silvas Sports Bar and Lounge and Silvas Sports Bar and Lounge
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Monos Grill LLC et al
as 4:2024cv03838
Defendant:
Alejandro Carmona doing business as Mono's Colombian Restaurant, Monos Grill LLC doing business as Mono's Colombian Restaurant and David Carmona doing business as Mono's Colombian Restaurant
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the October 10, 2021 Colombia v. Brazil Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.