Pablo Sabillon Machado v. Executive Office of Immigration Review et al

Petitioner: Pablo Sabillon Machado
Respondent: Executive Office of Immigration Review and DHS ICE
Case Number: 2:2013cv02329
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Referring Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pablo Sabillon Machado v. Executive Office of Immigration Review et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pablo Sabillon Machado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Executive Office of Immigration Review
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DHS ICE
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.