Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 287
M. D. C., et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5347
Plaintiff / Appellant: Y. O. T., D. P. R., G. G. L., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee: William Pelham Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Andrew Davidson, in his official capacity as USCIS Asylum Office Division Chief and others
Concely Mendez Rojas, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-35988
Defendant / Appellee: TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director of United States Customs and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELMER GEOVANNI RODRIGUEZ ESCOBAR, LIDIA MARGARITA LOPEZ ORELLANA, CONCELY DEL CARMEN MENDEZ ROJAS and others
Claimant: ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
J.S.M, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-17204
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Acting Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Petitioner / Appellant: J. S. M., et al
Davis v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2020cv03254
Defendant: Executive Office for Immigration Review
Plaintiff: Timothy W. Davis
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
Heckmann v. U.S. Executive Office For Immigration Review et al
as 1:2020cv24636
Defendant: Jorge Rodriguez, Stephanie Gilliard, U.S. Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff: Brian E. Heckman
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant: Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff: Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 1:2020cv03148
Defendant: U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Plaintiff: CHICAGO CHAPTER, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11890
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Medina Portillo v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-2031
Respondent / Appellee: TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID HARDING WETMORE, Chief Appellate Immigration Judge of the Board of Immigration Appeals, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL MEDINA PORTILLO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?