Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Vault Denim et al
| Deodar Brands, LLC, RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc. |
| John and Jane Does, Vault Denim and XYZ Companies |
| 2:2013cv08959 |
| December 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON CONSENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Vault Denim, LLC ("Vault Denim"), its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, directo rs, principals, servants, employees, successors and assigns, including its Chief Executive Officer, Jim Pare, and Chief Creative Officer, Steve Price ("Price"), and all those in active concert or participation with Vault Denim, or under its direct or indirect control, re hereby enjoined, restrained and prohibited re copyright and trademark owned by Plaintiffs Sweet People Apparel, Inc. d/b/a MISS ME ("Sweet People"), RCRV, Inc. d/b/a ROCK REVIVAL ("RCRV"), and Deoda r Brands, LLC d/b/a MEK DENIM ("Deodar Brands") Brands, Sweet People Copyrighted Designs, Sweet People's FABRIC CUT OUT DESIGN Trademark, RCRV's INVERTED FLEUR-DE-LIS DESIGN Trademark, and Deodar Brands' M DESIGN Trademark, e tc. A money judgment in the amount of $2,000,000 shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Vault Denim and Price, jointly and severally, such sum representing the portion of the settlement payment agreed upon by the Parties that remain s unpaid pursuant to the Parties' Settlement Agreement. The Parties waive any right to appeal this Permanent Injunction Order Judgment on Consent. The Parties agree that each Party shall bear its own costs and fees associated with this Permanent Injunction Order and Judgment on Consent and the Civil Action. See document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
30
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Protective Order 29 . In connection with the production of confidential documents and other confidential information in this action, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby enter into this Stipulated Protective Order for confidential Treatment of Documents or Information (the "Stipulated Protective Order"). (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
|
Filing
15
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 23, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
