Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Sweet People Apparel, Inc., et al v. Phoenix Fibers, Inc., et al
as 18-55036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SWEET PEOPLE APPAREL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Miss Me and RCRV, INC., a California corporation, DBA Rock Revival
Defendant - Appellee:
PHOENIX FIBERS, INC., an Arizona corporation, COMAK TRADING, INC., a California corporation, LYDIA EVILSA TERRAZAS CHO and others
RCRV, Inc. d/b/a Rock Revival v. DrJays.com, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
Defendant:
DrJays.com, Inc., XYZ Companies 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RCRV, Inc. v. Alpha Garment, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05708
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
Defendant:
Alpha Garment, Inc., Belk Store Services, Inc., XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RCRV, Inc v. Affliction Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03582
Defendant:
Affliction Holdings, LLC, John and Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
RCRV, Inc. v. Federal Jeans, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03736
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Jeans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RCRV, Inc v. Gracing, Inc., et al
as 2:2016cv02829
Defendant:
Gracing, Inc, John and Jane Does, Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
RCRV, Inc. v. Ghacham, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01544
Defendant:
XYZ Companies, Mohamed Ghacham, Ghacham, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Phoenix Fibers, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00940
Defendant:
Lydia Evilsa Terrazas Cho, Myung Kwon Cho, Comak Trading, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
RCRV Inc v. Hidden Jeans, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02083
Defendant:
Hidden Jeans, Inc., Jane Does, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV Inc
RCRV Inc v. Adam Tala Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00550
Defendant:
Adam Tala Inc, John and Jane Does, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
