California Sea Urchin Commission et al v. Michaeldoc Bean et al
Plaintiff: California Abalone Association, California Sea Urchin Commission and Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara
Defendant: Daniel M. Ashe, Michael Bean, Department of Interior and United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Case Number: 2:2014cv08499
Filed: November 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 JUDGMENT RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS, FEDERAL DEFENDANTS, AND INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter that the Court now enters its Final Judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs' suit is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sea Urchin Commission et al v. Michaeldoc Bean et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel M. Ashe
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Pollak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Bean
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Pollak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Interior
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Pollak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Pollak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Abalone Association
Represented By: Damien M Schiff
Represented By: Jonathan Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sea Urchin Commission
Represented By: Damien M Schiff
Represented By: Jonathan Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara
Represented By: Damien M Schiff
Represented By: Jonathan Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?