Arthur Williams et al v. Brinderson Constructors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carl Curtis and Arthur Williams
Defendant: Brinderson Constructors, Inc. and Does
Case Number: 2:2015cv02474
Filed: April 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court approves the following payments, after which the remainingsettlement funds shall be distributed to the Participating Class Members pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation and Final Approval Order: California Labor and Workforce Development Agency: $10,000.00; Plaintiff ARTHUR WILLIAMS (as a Service Award): $5,000.00; Plaintiff CARL CURTIS (as a Service Award): $5,000.00; Class Counsel (as attorney's fees): $99,900.00; Class Counsel (as litigation costs and expenses): $8,288.09; and CPT Group, Inc. (for claims administration fees): $8,500.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
August 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, t o Stay Proceeding filed by Defendant Brinderson Constructors, Inc. 18 . The Court DENIES the Motion as to only Plaintiffs' fifth claim for relief, and then the third and seventh claims to the extent they are based on the fifth claim. Otherwise, the Court GRANTS the Motion as to Plaintiffs' first, second, third, fourth, sixth and seventh claims, without leave to amend. Brinderson shall file and serve an Answer to Plaintiffs' third, fifth and seventh claims within 14 days of the filing of this Order. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arthur Williams et al v. Brinderson Constructors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brinderson Constructors, Inc.
Represented By: Lisa M Bertain
Represented By: Anne P Daher
Represented By: Nathan Randall Jaskowiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Curtis
Represented By: Andrew Clayton Ellison
Represented By: Michael Anthony Strauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Williams
Represented By: Andrew Clayton Ellison
Represented By: Michael Anthony Strauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?